View
Semantic Search: Tesamorelin Degradation Baseline vs Month 1 | Room Temp vs Refrigerated | Peptide Crafters
Fwd: Tesamorelin Degradation Baseline vs Month 1 | Room Temp vs Refrigerated | Peptide Crafters
Score 0.909
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/19/2026, 3:17:25 PM
Fwd: Tesamorelin Degradation Baseline vs Month 1 | Room Temp vs Refrigerated | Peptide Crafters from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-03-19T19:17:25.000Z shoutout to Peptide Crafters for running this properly and letting me share it with the community in real time. > Upgrade to paid > You're currently a free subscriber to Peptide Price. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription. > Upgrade to paid > > Share > > > Like > Comment > Restack > > © 2026 Derek Pruski > 548 Market Street PMB 72296, Sa
Tesamorelin Degradation Baseline vs Month 1 | Room Temp vs Refrigerated | Peptide Crafters
Score 0.902
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/19/2026, 3:01:33 PM
Tesamorelin Degradation Baseline vs Month 1 | Room Temp vs Refrigerated | Peptide Crafters from derekpruski@substack.com on 2026-03-19T19:01:33.000Z Sample B (Room Temperature — 68–70°F) Baseline: 11.46 mg | 99.876% Month 1: 10.81 mg | 98.184% Content loss: 0.65 mg (-5.67%) Purity loss: 1.692 percentage points Sample C (Frozen — -39°F) Baseline: 10.90 mg | 99.861% Month 1: 10.59 mg | 99.732% Content loss: 0.31 mg (-2.84%) Purity loss: 0.129 percentage points What The Numbers Actually Mean Think
Fwd: Tesamorelin Degradation Baseline vs Month 1 | Room Temp vs Refrigerated | Peptide Crafters
Score 0.901
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/19/2026, 3:17:25 PM
Fwd: Tesamorelin Degradation Baseline vs Month 1 | Room Temp vs Refrigerated | Peptide Crafters from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-03-19T19:17:25.000Z ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Derek from Peptide Price <derekpruski@substack.com> Date: Mar 19, 2026 at 3:02 PM -0400 To: tjphuhs@gmail.com Subject: Tesamorelin Degradation Baseline vs Month 1 | Room Temp vs Refrigerated | Peptide Crafters > Earlier today I shared a sneak peek at the first month of Peptide Crafters’ Tesamorelin degrada
Tesamorelin Degradation Baseline vs Month 1 | Room Temp vs Refrigerated | Peptide Crafters
Score 0.892
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/19/2026, 3:01:33 PM
Tesamorelin Degradation Baseline vs Month 1 | Room Temp vs Refrigerated | Peptide Crafters from derekpruski@substack.com on 2026-03-19T19:01:33.000Z View this post on the web at https://derekpruski.substack.com/p/tesamorelin-degradation-baseline Earlier today I shared a sneak peek at the first month of Peptide Crafters’ Tesamorelin degradation study. Shortly after they got back to me with the baseline COA, so now we can do a proper comparison. Here’s the full breakdown. Most people in this space
Fwd: Tesamorelin Degradation Baseline vs Month 1 | Room Temp vs Refrigerated | Peptide Crafters
Score 0.886
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/19/2026, 3:17:25 PM
Fwd: Tesamorelin Degradation Baseline vs Month 1 | Room Temp vs Refrigerated | Peptide Crafters from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-03-19T19:17:25.000Z loss: 1.692 percentage points > > Sample C (Frozen — -39°F) > > • > Baseline: 10.90 mg | 99.861% > • > Month 1: 10.59 mg | 99.732% > • > Content loss: 0.31 mg (-2.84%) > • > Purity loss: 0.129 percentage points > > What The Numbers Actually Mean > Think of purity as how much of what’s in the vial is actually the peptide you want versus broken down byp
Fwd: Tesamorelin Degradation Baseline vs Month 1 | Room Temp vs Refrigerated | Peptide Crafters
Score 0.879
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/19/2026, 3:17:25 PM
Fwd: Tesamorelin Degradation Baseline vs Month 1 | Room Temp vs Refrigerated | Peptide Crafters from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-03-19T19:17:25.000Z what happens when you don’t. This study starts to answer that question with real numbers from a controlled comparison. > Study Setup > Same batch (PC-G2-TS10), three samples tested by Janoshik on February 16, 2026 to establish a starting point — think of this as the “before” snapshot. Two months of additional testing still to come. > Here’s how the ti
Tesamorelin Degradation Data — We're Getting It After All | Peptide Crafters 3-Month Study | Month 1 Sneak Peek
Score 0.829
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/19/2026, 8:35:06 AM
Tesamorelin Degradation Data — We're Getting It After All | Peptide Crafters 3-Month Study | Month 1 Sneak Peek from derekpruski@substack.com on 2026-03-19T12:35:06.000Z View this post on the web at https://derekpruski.substack.com/p/tesamorelin-degradation-data-were I know a lot of you were disappointed when our own degradation study through Freedom Diagnostics didn’t work out. The good news is we’re going to get that data anyway — Peptide Crafters is running a three-month Tesamorelin degradati
Fwd: Tesamorelin Degradation Data — We're Getting It After All | Peptide Crafters 3-Month Study | Month 1 Sneak Peek
Score 0.826
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/19/2026, 8:53:16 AM
Fwd: Tesamorelin Degradation Data — We're Getting It After All | Peptide Crafters 3-Month Study | Month 1 Sneak Peek from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-03-19T12:53:16.000Z month one results. > The setup is straightforward: two samples from the same batch, one stored at room temperature and one refrigerated, tested once a month for three months. The goal is to compare purity and degradation loss across both storage conditions over time and give the community real data to work with. By the time this w
Fwd: Tesamorelin Degradation Data — We're Getting It After All | Peptide Crafters 3-Month Study | Month 1 Sneak Peek
Score 0.778
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/19/2026, 8:53:16 AM
Fwd: Tesamorelin Degradation Data — We're Getting It After All | Peptide Crafters 3-Month Study | Month 1 Sneak Peek from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-03-19T12:53:16.000Z ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Derek from Peptide Price <derekpruski@substack.com> Date: Mar 19, 2026 at 8:37 AM -0400 To: tjphuhs@gmail.com Subject: Tesamorelin Degradation Data — We're Getting It After All | Peptide Crafters 3-Month Study | Month 1 Sneak Peek > I know a lot of you were disappointed when our own de
Mold Toxicity & Peptides: A Comprehensive Walkthrough
Score 0.671
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 4/28/2026, 7:52:08 PM
Mold Toxicity & Peptides: A Comprehensive Walkthrough from derekpruski@substack.com on 2026-04-28T23:52:08.000Z can work. The “arginine salt” version of certain peptides looks similar on a label but doesn’t survive — it’s marketed as “stable” but functionally less effective. Section 5: The Layered Research Framework This is the sequencing that’s emerging from clinical observation. Each layer prepares the system for the next. Skipping ahead causes problems — running offensive peptides before defe
Two Vials of Tirzepatide Got Lost in the Mail for Two Years. Here's What the Data Showed.
Score 0.669
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 5/9/2026, 7:49:04 AM
Two Vials of Tirzepatide Got Lost in the Mail for Two Years. Here's What the Data Showed. from derekpruski@substack.com on 2026-05-09T11:49:04.000Z for the likely overstatement, real degradation is closer to 1.2%. There’s a second piece of validation worth pointing out: both vials came back within a tenth of a percent of each other (98.52% and 98.37%). That’s not a one-off reading. Two separate vials, exposed to the same wandering shipping conditions, landed in the same purity range. That’s repr
Why You Should NOT Refrigerate Amino Blends (Lipo-C, L-Carnitine, etc.)
Score 0.665
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 4/7/2026, 2:03:33 PM
Why You Should NOT Refrigerate Amino Blends (Lipo-C, L-Carnitine, etc.) from derekpruski@substack.com on 2026-04-07T18:03:33.000Z vial. Once a vial is opened and in active use, the preservative continues protecting the solution at room temperature across a normal use window. So what actually causes degradation? The real enemies of amino blends are: Light exposure — B12 in particular breaks down quickly when exposed to direct light. Keep vials away from windows and out of direct sunlight. Extreme
Fwd: Does Tesamorelin Have a Monopoly on Visceral Fat? Not So Fast.
Score 0.664
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/17/2026, 3:31:51 PM
Fwd: Does Tesamorelin Have a Monopoly on Visceral Fat? Not So Fast. from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-03-17T19:31:51.000Z TJ Begin forwarded message: From: Derek from Peptide Price <derekpruski@substack.com> Date: March 17, 2026 at 2:53:26 PM EDT To: tjphuhs@gmail.com Subject: Does Tesamorelin Have a Monopoly on Visceral Fat? Not So Fast. Reply-To: Derek from Peptide Price <reply+35vy39&4iwoe6&&a9dea849b6218e124929dc571b58063b8bd75d6bdec5ea7dd663a1b6b1b8e22d@mg1.substack.com> Does Tesamorelin Have
Fwd: Does Tesamorelin Have a Monopoly on Visceral Fat? Not So Fast.
Score 0.657
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/17/2026, 3:31:51 PM
Fwd: Does Tesamorelin Have a Monopoly on Visceral Fat? Not So Fast. from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-03-17T19:31:51.000Z have meaningful overlap through the same mechanism — we just can’t quantify it yet. That’s a very different statement than “the others don’t work.” What I’m Actually Curious About This is the part I genuinely don’t have a clean answer to, and I think it’s worth sitting with. If you’ve run a longer protocol with CJC-1295, Ipamorelin, or MK-677 — did you track body composition wit
Fwd: Does Tesamorelin Have a Monopoly on Visceral Fat? Not So Fast.
Score 0.656
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/17/2026, 3:31:51 PM
Fwd: Does Tesamorelin Have a Monopoly on Visceral Fat? Not So Fast. from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-03-17T19:31:51.000Z sustained signaling. CJC-1295 CJC-1295 comes in two versions and they behave very differently, so it’s worth separating them. CJC-1295 without DAC — sometimes called Mod GRF 1-29 — has a half-life of around 30 minutes, putting it in the same range as Tesamorelin. It produces a pulsatile GH response and is typically dosed multiple times per day. CJC-1295 with DAC is a different a
💝 My Favorite Peptides for MOMS!!
Score 0.651
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 5/10/2026, 9:23:48 AM
💝 My Favorite Peptides for MOMS!! from jeff@projectbiohacked.com on 2026-05-10T13:23:48.000Z few calories. * *Split dosing can help to reduce side effects.* Ex. If your dose is 2.5mg of T you go 1.25mg every 3 days. Helps lower the peak spike which equals more stable levels and lessening of side effects. *Sourcing GLP Peptides:* *● ATOMIK Peptides* 🇺🇸 (Tirz Research) - 3rd Party Batch Tested Use Discount code *Biohacked15 (15% off)* *https://atomiklabz.com* ( https://atomiklabz.com ) *GLPs ar
Does Tesamorelin Have a Monopoly on Visceral Fat? Not So Fast.
Score 0.643
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/17/2026, 2:53:19 PM
Does Tesamorelin Have a Monopoly on Visceral Fat? Not So Fast. from derekpruski@substack.com on 2026-03-17T18:53:19.000Z a population with naturally declining GH — over six months. Fat mass decreased. Lean mass increased. Visceral fat wasn’t the specific endpoint, so we don’t have precise imaging data. But the directional result is exactly what you’d expect given the mechanism. The honest limitation here is that 10 minutes may simply not be long enough to drive consistent, meaningful visceral fa
Why Peptide Cycles Look Like a Slope, Not a Light Switch
Score 0.643
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/29/2026, 9:14:23 PM
Why Peptide Cycles Look Like a Slope, Not a Light Switch from derekpruski@substack.com on 2026-03-30T01:14:23.000Z compounds with extended half-lives Adjust slowly — changes take time to show up Don’t measure results at week one or two; measure at week four or five, after steady state has had a chance to establish Time bloodwork correctly — several weeks in, or several weeks after stopping — not immediately at either end When the cycle ends, treat the washout seriously — especially if doses were
Mold Toxicity & Peptides: A Comprehensive Walkthrough
Score 0.642
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 4/28/2026, 7:52:08 PM
Mold Toxicity & Peptides: A Comprehensive Walkthrough from derekpruski@substack.com on 2026-04-28T23:52:08.000Z already running. It’s an offensive weapon. You don’t deploy offense before the defense is built. Research dosing in the literature varies considerably. The principle that holds across the published work: start at a fraction of the target dose and titrate up. If an RS reacts to half a Peptide-S capsule, they’re going to react to LL-37 — period. Some research protocols start at 10% of th
Why Some Peptides Sting More Than Others: The pH Explanation
Score 0.642
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/28/2026, 11:54:20 AM
Why Some Peptides Sting More Than Others: The pH Explanation from derekpruski@substack.com on 2026-03-28T15:54:20.000Z and feel milder. Others sit lower and sting more. Tesamorelin — approximately 4.5 to 6.0 Tesamorelin is a 44 amino acid GHRH analog — meaning it mimics the hormone that signals the pituitary to release growth hormone. Its solutions typically land in the 4.5 to 6.0 range. At the higher end of that window it begins approaching a more tolerable distance from tissue pH, which is why
Fwd: BAC Water Amazon Testing — March 2026 | Only 2 of 11 Passed | Data Shared by Peptide Crafters
Score 0.638
· Account oc.tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/18/2026, 9:54:30 AM
Fwd: BAC Water Amazon Testing — March 2026 | Only 2 of 11 Passed | Data Shared by Peptide Crafters from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-03-18T13:54:30.000Z I had the chance to meet the owner recently and we both landed on the same page — more real data in the hands of researchers is always the right call, regardless of any commercial relationship. They gave me permission to share early results from their latest round of Amazon BAC water testing. These COAs were just completed in March 2026 by Vanguard
Fwd: Spermidine, NAD+, and Longevity
Score 0.638
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 2/26/2026, 12:36:17 AM
Fwd: Spermidine, NAD+, and Longevity from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-02-26T05:36:17.000Z the Peptide Cheat Sheet: Peptide Cheat Sheet 👉All my daily essentials on Amazon Amazon Storefront 👉Get discounts on your favorite peptides and research chemicals: PEPTIDES BioLongevity Labs (use code hunterw for 15% off): https://biolongevitylabs.com/ 👉10% off the BEST workout supplements from Unmatched Supps (pre-workout, whey protein, creatine, EAAs, electrolytes - use code HUNTERW at checkout): https://
Why You Should NOT Refrigerate Amino Blends (Lipo-C, L-Carnitine, etc.)
Score 0.638
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 4/7/2026, 2:03:33 PM
Why You Should NOT Refrigerate Amino Blends (Lipo-C, L-Carnitine, etc.) from derekpruski@substack.com on 2026-04-07T18:03:33.000Z View this post on the web at https://derekpruski.substack.com/p/why-you-should-not-refrigerate-amino This comes up constantly and the answer surprises most people: amino-based blends like Lipo-C, L-Carnitine, and similar compounded solutions are typically best stored at room temperature — refrigerating them can actually cause problems. I actually struggled a lot with
Why Peptide Cycles Look Like a Slope, Not a Light Switch
Score 0.638
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/29/2026, 9:14:23 PM
Why Peptide Cycles Look Like a Slope, Not a Light Switch from derekpruski@substack.com on 2026-03-30T01:14:23.000Z much. Or they stop a cycle, pull labs a week later, and think they’re already back to baseline. Neither snapshot tells the full story. Bloodwork reflects a system in motion, not a fixed point. Biomarkers — IGF-1, fasting insulin, lipids, hormones — shift gradually in response to peptide exposure, just like the effects themselves. It takes time for the body’s internal environment to
💝 My Favorite Peptides for MOMS!!
Score 0.637
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 5/10/2026, 9:23:48 AM
💝 My Favorite Peptides for MOMS!! from jeff@projectbiohacked.com on 2026-05-10T13:23:48.000Z Place in Voting for Favorite Peptide Supplier) Group Discount Code: *Biohacked15* (15% off) https://solutionpeptides.net/product/new-cjc-1295-5mg-ipamorelin-blend-5mg-blend-10mg/ ( https://solutionpeptides.net/product/new-cjc-1295-5mg-ipamorelin-blend-5mg-blend-10mg/ ) *IPAMORELIN by itself:* *ATOMIK LABZ* 🇺🇸 Only group vetted source for Tirz right now* Group Discount Code: *Biohacked15* (15% off) htt