View
Semantic Search: Fwd: Tesamorelin Degradation Baseline vs Month 1 | Room Temp vs Refrigerated | Peptide Crafters
Fwd: Tesamorelin Degradation Baseline vs Month 1 | Room Temp vs Refrigerated | Peptide Crafters
Score 0.940
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/19/2026, 3:17:25 PM
Fwd: Tesamorelin Degradation Baseline vs Month 1 | Room Temp vs Refrigerated | Peptide Crafters from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-03-19T19:17:25.000Z shoutout to Peptide Crafters for running this properly and letting me share it with the community in real time. > Upgrade to paid > You're currently a free subscriber to Peptide Price. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription. > Upgrade to paid > > Share > > > Like > Comment > Restack > > © 2026 Derek Pruski > 548 Market Street PMB 72296, Sa
Fwd: Tesamorelin Degradation Baseline vs Month 1 | Room Temp vs Refrigerated | Peptide Crafters
Score 0.930
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/19/2026, 3:17:25 PM
Fwd: Tesamorelin Degradation Baseline vs Month 1 | Room Temp vs Refrigerated | Peptide Crafters from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-03-19T19:17:25.000Z ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Derek from Peptide Price <derekpruski@substack.com> Date: Mar 19, 2026 at 3:02 PM -0400 To: tjphuhs@gmail.com Subject: Tesamorelin Degradation Baseline vs Month 1 | Room Temp vs Refrigerated | Peptide Crafters > Earlier today I shared a sneak peek at the first month of Peptide Crafters’ Tesamorelin degrada
Fwd: Tesamorelin Degradation Baseline vs Month 1 | Room Temp vs Refrigerated | Peptide Crafters
Score 0.911
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/19/2026, 3:17:25 PM
Fwd: Tesamorelin Degradation Baseline vs Month 1 | Room Temp vs Refrigerated | Peptide Crafters from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-03-19T19:17:25.000Z loss: 1.692 percentage points > > Sample C (Frozen — -39°F) > > • > Baseline: 10.90 mg | 99.861% > • > Month 1: 10.59 mg | 99.732% > • > Content loss: 0.31 mg (-2.84%) > • > Purity loss: 0.129 percentage points > > What The Numbers Actually Mean > Think of purity as how much of what’s in the vial is actually the peptide you want versus broken down byp
Fwd: Tesamorelin Degradation Baseline vs Month 1 | Room Temp vs Refrigerated | Peptide Crafters
Score 0.910
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/19/2026, 3:17:25 PM
Fwd: Tesamorelin Degradation Baseline vs Month 1 | Room Temp vs Refrigerated | Peptide Crafters from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-03-19T19:17:25.000Z what happens when you don’t. This study starts to answer that question with real numbers from a controlled comparison. > Study Setup > Same batch (PC-G2-TS10), three samples tested by Janoshik on February 16, 2026 to establish a starting point — think of this as the “before” snapshot. Two months of additional testing still to come. > Here’s how the ti
Tesamorelin Degradation Baseline vs Month 1 | Room Temp vs Refrigerated | Peptide Crafters
Score 0.889
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/19/2026, 3:01:33 PM
Tesamorelin Degradation Baseline vs Month 1 | Room Temp vs Refrigerated | Peptide Crafters from derekpruski@substack.com on 2026-03-19T19:01:33.000Z Sample B (Room Temperature — 68–70°F) Baseline: 11.46 mg | 99.876% Month 1: 10.81 mg | 98.184% Content loss: 0.65 mg (-5.67%) Purity loss: 1.692 percentage points Sample C (Frozen — -39°F) Baseline: 10.90 mg | 99.861% Month 1: 10.59 mg | 99.732% Content loss: 0.31 mg (-2.84%) Purity loss: 0.129 percentage points What The Numbers Actually Mean Think
Tesamorelin Degradation Baseline vs Month 1 | Room Temp vs Refrigerated | Peptide Crafters
Score 0.879
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/19/2026, 3:01:33 PM
Tesamorelin Degradation Baseline vs Month 1 | Room Temp vs Refrigerated | Peptide Crafters from derekpruski@substack.com on 2026-03-19T19:01:33.000Z View this post on the web at https://derekpruski.substack.com/p/tesamorelin-degradation-baseline Earlier today I shared a sneak peek at the first month of Peptide Crafters’ Tesamorelin degradation study. Shortly after they got back to me with the baseline COA, so now we can do a proper comparison. Here’s the full breakdown. Most people in this space
Fwd: Tesamorelin Degradation Data — We're Getting It After All | Peptide Crafters 3-Month Study | Month 1 Sneak Peek
Score 0.863
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/19/2026, 8:53:16 AM
Fwd: Tesamorelin Degradation Data — We're Getting It After All | Peptide Crafters 3-Month Study | Month 1 Sneak Peek from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-03-19T12:53:16.000Z month one results. > The setup is straightforward: two samples from the same batch, one stored at room temperature and one refrigerated, tested once a month for three months. The goal is to compare purity and degradation loss across both storage conditions over time and give the community real data to work with. By the time this w
Tesamorelin Degradation Data — We're Getting It After All | Peptide Crafters 3-Month Study | Month 1 Sneak Peek
Score 0.831
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/19/2026, 8:35:06 AM
Tesamorelin Degradation Data — We're Getting It After All | Peptide Crafters 3-Month Study | Month 1 Sneak Peek from derekpruski@substack.com on 2026-03-19T12:35:06.000Z View this post on the web at https://derekpruski.substack.com/p/tesamorelin-degradation-data-were I know a lot of you were disappointed when our own degradation study through Freedom Diagnostics didn’t work out. The good news is we’re going to get that data anyway — Peptide Crafters is running a three-month Tesamorelin degradati
Fwd: Tesamorelin Degradation Data — We're Getting It After All | Peptide Crafters 3-Month Study | Month 1 Sneak Peek
Score 0.830
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/19/2026, 8:53:16 AM
Fwd: Tesamorelin Degradation Data — We're Getting It After All | Peptide Crafters 3-Month Study | Month 1 Sneak Peek from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-03-19T12:53:16.000Z ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Derek from Peptide Price <derekpruski@substack.com> Date: Mar 19, 2026 at 8:37 AM -0400 To: tjphuhs@gmail.com Subject: Tesamorelin Degradation Data — We're Getting It After All | Peptide Crafters 3-Month Study | Month 1 Sneak Peek > I know a lot of you were disappointed when our own de
Fwd: Does Tesamorelin Have a Monopoly on Visceral Fat? Not So Fast.
Score 0.717
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/17/2026, 3:31:51 PM
Fwd: Does Tesamorelin Have a Monopoly on Visceral Fat? Not So Fast. from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-03-17T19:31:51.000Z TJ Begin forwarded message: From: Derek from Peptide Price <derekpruski@substack.com> Date: March 17, 2026 at 2:53:26 PM EDT To: tjphuhs@gmail.com Subject: Does Tesamorelin Have a Monopoly on Visceral Fat? Not So Fast. Reply-To: Derek from Peptide Price <reply+35vy39&4iwoe6&&a9dea849b6218e124929dc571b58063b8bd75d6bdec5ea7dd663a1b6b1b8e22d@mg1.substack.com> Does Tesamorelin Have
Fwd: Does Tesamorelin Have a Monopoly on Visceral Fat? Not So Fast.
Score 0.707
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/17/2026, 3:31:51 PM
Fwd: Does Tesamorelin Have a Monopoly on Visceral Fat? Not So Fast. from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-03-17T19:31:51.000Z have meaningful overlap through the same mechanism — we just can’t quantify it yet. That’s a very different statement than “the others don’t work.” What I’m Actually Curious About This is the part I genuinely don’t have a clean answer to, and I think it’s worth sitting with. If you’ve run a longer protocol with CJC-1295, Ipamorelin, or MK-677 — did you track body composition wit
Fwd: Does Tesamorelin Have a Monopoly on Visceral Fat? Not So Fast.
Score 0.704
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/17/2026, 3:31:51 PM
Fwd: Does Tesamorelin Have a Monopoly on Visceral Fat? Not So Fast. from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-03-17T19:31:51.000Z sustained signaling. CJC-1295 CJC-1295 comes in two versions and they behave very differently, so it’s worth separating them. CJC-1295 without DAC — sometimes called Mod GRF 1-29 — has a half-life of around 30 minutes, putting it in the same range as Tesamorelin. It produces a pulsatile GH response and is typically dosed multiple times per day. CJC-1295 with DAC is a different a
Fwd: Spermidine, NAD+, and Longevity
Score 0.688
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 2/26/2026, 12:36:17 AM
Fwd: Spermidine, NAD+, and Longevity from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-02-26T05:36:17.000Z the Peptide Cheat Sheet: Peptide Cheat Sheet 👉All my daily essentials on Amazon Amazon Storefront 👉Get discounts on your favorite peptides and research chemicals: PEPTIDES BioLongevity Labs (use code hunterw for 15% off): https://biolongevitylabs.com/ 👉10% off the BEST workout supplements from Unmatched Supps (pre-workout, whey protein, creatine, EAAs, electrolytes - use code HUNTERW at checkout): https://
Mold Toxicity & Peptides: A Comprehensive Walkthrough
Score 0.686
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 4/28/2026, 7:52:08 PM
Mold Toxicity & Peptides: A Comprehensive Walkthrough from derekpruski@substack.com on 2026-04-28T23:52:08.000Z can work. The “arginine salt” version of certain peptides looks similar on a label but doesn’t survive — it’s marketed as “stable” but functionally less effective. Section 5: The Layered Research Framework This is the sequencing that’s emerging from clinical observation. Each layer prepares the system for the next. Skipping ahead causes problems — running offensive peptides before defe
Fwd: What Do You Do When Your First Vial Is Running Low?
Score 0.682
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/15/2026, 2:46:14 PM
Fwd: What Do You Do When Your First Vial Is Running Low? from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-03-15T18:46:14.000Z peptide is no longer properly dissolved and you can’t accurately dose it. > > None of those outcomes are what you want in a research setting where precision and consistency matter. > The Simple Rule > Treat each vial as its own sterile environment. Use it, finish it or toss what’s left, and start fresh. A few extra minutes of setup is worth protecting the integrity of your research compoun
Fwd: What Do You Do When Your First Vial Is Running Low?
Score 0.682
· Account oc.tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/15/2026, 2:46:14 PM
Fwd: What Do You Do When Your First Vial Is Running Low? from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-03-15T18:46:14.000Z peptide is no longer properly dissolved and you can’t accurately dose it. > > None of those outcomes are what you want in a research setting where precision and consistency matter. > The Simple Rule > Treat each vial as its own sterile environment. Use it, finish it or toss what’s left, and start fresh. A few extra minutes of setup is worth protecting the integrity of your research compoun
Fwd: How Long Does It Actually Take To Resensitize Your GLP-1 Receptors?
Score 0.681
· Account oc.tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/15/2026, 2:45:56 PM
Fwd: How Long Does It Actually Take To Resensitize Your GLP-1 Receptors? from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-03-15T18:45:56.000Z > > • > Lower research amounts → 6-8 weeks minimum > • > Moderate research amounts → 8 weeks as the general gold standard > • > Higher research amounts → 8-12 weeks to allow adequate receptor recovery > > On Reintroduction: Don’t Jump Back To Your Previous Amount > This part matters as much as the washout itself. When reintroducing after a 6-12 week break, re-titrate from t
Fwd: How Long Does It Actually Take To Resensitize Your GLP-1 Receptors?
Score 0.679
· Account oc.tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/15/2026, 2:45:56 PM
Fwd: How Long Does It Actually Take To Resensitize Your GLP-1 Receptors? from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-03-15T18:45:56.000Z > Upgrade to paid > First, Why Do Receptors Desensitize In The First Place? > GLP-1 receptors aren’t just in your stomach - they’re distributed throughout your gut, brain, and nervous system. When a long-acting GLP-1 compound is being administered week after week, those receptors are receiving a continuous, sustained signal. Over time the body does what it always does - it
Fwd: The Future of Peptides, Longevity, and Human Performance
Score 0.677
· Account oc.tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/20/2026, 10:03:01 PM
Fwd: The Future of Peptides, Longevity, and Human Performance from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-03-21T02:03:01.000Z the Peptide Cheat Sheet: > > • > Peptide Cheat Sheet > > 👉All my daily essentials on Amazon > > • > Amazon Storefront > > 👉Get discounts on your favorite peptides and research chemicals: > > • > PEPTIDES > • > BioLongevity Labs (use code hunterw for 15% off): https://biolongevitylabs.com/ > > 👉10% off the BEST workout supplements from Unmatched Supps (pre-workout, whey protein, cre
Fwd: The Future of Peptides, Longevity, and Human Performance
Score 0.677
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/20/2026, 10:03:01 PM
Fwd: The Future of Peptides, Longevity, and Human Performance from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-03-21T02:03:01.000Z the Peptide Cheat Sheet: > > • > Peptide Cheat Sheet > > 👉All my daily essentials on Amazon > > • > Amazon Storefront > > 👉Get discounts on your favorite peptides and research chemicals: > > • > PEPTIDES > • > BioLongevity Labs (use code hunterw for 15% off): https://biolongevitylabs.com/ > > 👉10% off the BEST workout supplements from Unmatched Supps (pre-workout, whey protein, cre
Two Vials of Tirzepatide Got Lost in the Mail for Two Years. Here's What the Data Showed.
Score 0.677
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 5/9/2026, 7:49:04 AM
Two Vials of Tirzepatide Got Lost in the Mail for Two Years. Here's What the Data Showed. from derekpruski@substack.com on 2026-05-09T11:49:04.000Z for the likely overstatement, real degradation is closer to 1.2%. There’s a second piece of validation worth pointing out: both vials came back within a tenth of a percent of each other (98.52% and 98.37%). That’s not a one-off reading. Two separate vials, exposed to the same wandering shipping conditions, landed in the same purity range. That’s repr
Fwd: Waking Up at 2–3am While Researching a GLP-1? Read This.
Score 0.677
· Account tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/18/2026, 4:18:18 PM
Fwd: Waking Up at 2–3am While Researching a GLP-1? Read This. from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-03-18T20:18:18.000Z overthink it — just make sure there’s enough fuel in the tank before lights out. > As always, this is for research purposes only. All compounds are research use only, not for human consumption. > Drop any questions below — happy to help you troubleshoot. > Upgrade to paid > You're currently a free subscriber to Peptide Price. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription. > Upgra
Fwd: How Long Does It Actually Take To Resensitize Your GLP-1 Receptors?
Score 0.676
· Account oc.tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/15/2026, 2:45:56 PM
Fwd: How Long Does It Actually Take To Resensitize Your GLP-1 Receptors? from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-03-15T18:45:56.000Z Week > Week 0 - Administration stops > Plasma levels begin their slow decline. Receptors are getting their first break from continuous stimulation, but clearance is far from complete and meaningful resensitization hasn’t started. > Weeks 1-2 > Significant compound is still circulating. Appetite will likely begin creeping back up and gastric emptying will start accelerating
Fwd: BAC Water Amazon Testing — March 2026 | Only 2 of 11 Passed | Data Shared by Peptide Crafters
Score 0.676
· Account oc.tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/18/2026, 9:54:30 AM
Fwd: BAC Water Amazon Testing — March 2026 | Only 2 of 11 Passed | Data Shared by Peptide Crafters from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-03-18T13:54:30.000Z I had the chance to meet the owner recently and we both landed on the same page — more real data in the hands of researchers is always the right call, regardless of any commercial relationship. They gave me permission to share early results from their latest round of Amazon BAC water testing. These COAs were just completed in March 2026 by Vanguard
Fwd: How Long Does It Actually Take To Resensitize Your GLP-1 Receptors?
Score 0.673
· Account oc.tjphuhs@gmail.com
· 3/15/2026, 2:45:56 PM
Fwd: How Long Does It Actually Take To Resensitize Your GLP-1 Receptors? from tjphuhs@gmail.com on 2026-03-15T18:45:56.000Z Sent with Spark ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Derek from Peptide Price <derekpruski@substack.com> Date: Mar 15, 2026 at 2:06 PM -0400 To: tjphuhs@gmail.com Subject: How Long Does It Actually Take To Resensitize Your GLP-1 Receptors? > This comes up constantly - “I’ll just take a week or two off and restart.” In reality, that’s not even close to enough time.