Subject: Can You Filter Your Way Out of Failed Sterility?
From: Derek from Peptide Price <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 16:48:22 +0000
List-Id: <derekpruski.substack.com>

View this post on the web at https://derekpruski.substack.com/p/can-you-filter-your-way-out-of-failed

Got a great question from a researcher recently that I think cuts to the heart of why third-party sterility testing exists in the first place — and why filtration isn’t a workaround.
The question:
“If researching with product already in hand without USP 71 Sterility Testing, would filtering it through a PES Hydrophilic Membrane 0.2μm Lab Filter remove any living microorganisms but not endotoxins? And would the greater health risk be microorganisms vs endotoxins?”
This is a genuinely good question, and parts of it are technically correct. But the conclusion it’s leading toward — that filtration can substitute for proper sterility testing — doesn’t hold up. Let’s break it down.
What the question gets right
0.2μm filtration can remove most living bacteria and fungi. And yes, endotoxins are generally the bigger concern compared to living microorganisms in most research scenarios. Both of those things are true.
But here’s where it breaks down: even if a product would fail sterility testing, running it through a 0.2μm filter does not mean it would pass afterward.
Why filtration isn’t a sterility guarantee
USP 71 Sterility Testing has zero tolerance. Any microbial growth equals a failure. Filtration reduces microbial load — it doesn’t eliminate it entirely, and it doesn’t come close to replicating what sterility testing actually verifies.
Here’s what can still get through or survive:
Spore-forming bacteria like Bacillus species are highly resistant and can survive filtration
Biofilms and clumped bacteria can partially shield organisms from being captured
Mycoplasma ranges from 0.1–0.3μm and can pass through a 0.2μm filter
Smaller viruses pass through entirely
Any breach in filter integrity or technique error compromises the whole process
And critically: none of this touches endotoxins at all.
What 0.2μm filtration actually removes
Most bacteria (typically 0.5–5μm)
Most fungi and yeasts (typically 2–10μm+)
Larger particles and debris
Some larger viruses
What it does not remove
Endotoxins — bacterial toxins that are only 10–100kDa in molecular weight, orders of magnitude smaller than the filter pores
Smaller viruses
Mycoplasma
Other bacterial toxins and pyrogens
Chemical contaminants
Bacterial spores that survive the process
Why endotoxins are usually the bigger concern
Living microorganisms require active multiplication to cause significant issues. A research subject’s immune response can often handle small amounts, and refrigerated storage slows growth considerably.
Endotoxins operate differently. They don’t need to be alive to cause problems. They trigger immediate inflammatory responses, are potent at very small concentrations, and are significantly harder to remove once present. Fever, inflammation, systemic reactions — endotoxins are behind all of it, and no amount of post-purchase filtration gets rid of them.
The analogy that makes it click
Think of a failed sterility product like the aftermath of a house party you weren’t invited to host.
You can remove most of the people — but you’re still left with all the garbage, spills, and damage they left behind, plus a few stragglers hiding in the closets.
Filtration gets rid of some of the guests. It doesn’t clean the house.
The bottom line
If a product was contaminated during manufacturing, filtering it afterward leaves you with all the toxic byproducts the bacteria produced while multiplying, potentially some resistant organisms that made it through, and still no guarantee the product would pass sterility testing.
There is no DIY workaround for proper manufacturing standards. This is exactly why USP 71 Sterility Testing exists — and why it’s become the benchmark worth paying attention to when evaluating vendors.
All research discussed is for research use only. Not for human consumption.

Unsubscribe https://substack.com/redirect/2/eyJlIjoiaHR0cHM6Ly9kZXJla3BydXNraS5zdWJzdGFjay5jb20vYWN0aW9uL2Rpc2FibGVfZW1haWw_dG9rZW49ZXlKMWMyVnlYMmxrSWpveU56TTJNakl6T1Rnc0luQnZjM1JmYVdRaU9qRTVNall6TVRneE9Td2lhV0YwSWpveE56YzBPRGc1TXpRMExDSmxlSEFpT2pFNE1EWTBNalV6TkRRc0ltbHpjeUk2SW5CMVlpMHpNelkxTXpZM0lpd2ljM1ZpSWpvaVpHbHpZV0pzWlY5bGJXRnBiQ0o5Lm1DU250TlVJeDAweTItQkkzdjJZcDRtbmo4VlZXNXRJNHVHVWtMSzI3dE0iLCJwIjoxOTI2MzE4MTksInMiOjMzNjUzNjcsImYiOnRydWUsInUiOjI3MzYyMjM5OCwiaWF0IjoxNzc0ODg5MzQ0LCJleHAiOjIwOTA0NjUzNDQsImlzcyI6InB1Yi0wIiwic3ViIjoibGluay1yZWRpcmVjdCJ9.DKiWB9YighCuDkdM-kwmkjg2KIb7riAP9UVnqTSj11w?